Superbooth 2026: Shear Electronics Relic, the fascinating bi-timbral OB-X clone, is now in production, and shipping starts very soon.
In 2017, Jacob Brashears unveiled the Relic—an analog clone of the Oberheim OB-X. The synthesizer had been in development for many years, with development updates presented at SynthPlex in 2022 and at NAMM in 2024.
Now, at Superbooth 2026, comes the big news: the Shear Electronics Relic is officially in production and shipping starts very soon.
Shear Electronics Relic New Details
After more than nine years in development, the Relic is now officially in production. Development takes place in Silicon Valley, while production is located in Taiwan.
According to the developer, both the analog and digital sections required significant effort, as the goal was to ensure they harmonized perfectly. Consequently, he notes that the entire Synthesizer can be calibrated in less than two minutes.
The final version retains 8 voices and is based on the Oberheim OB-X. Each voice features two analog oscillators, a multimode continuously morphable filter, four DAHDSR envelopes, and four LFOs.
According to Jacob, the Shear Electronics Relic will cost around 14000€ and is now available for pre-order.
Update from January 31, 2024
The last two weeks have been two Oberheim OB-X clone/replica projects on the menu table. Besides the Behringer UB-X, a Facebook post revealed that Shear Electronics was at NAMM 2024 with its mighty Relic Synthesizer.
This is the first time the synth has been public again since the SynthPlex Show 2022 where Sonicstate made a video about it. The Japanese synth and music instrument retailer RockoN published a video about it this morning.
Shear Electronics Relic NAMM 2024
Relic is an authentic clone/replica of the Oberheim OB-X with a bi-timbral architecture, created by a man show company Jacob Brashears. Jacob has been working on the synth since 2017 when he showed it at NAMM.
In the latest video demo, he says the hardware development is done. There are still some software things to do in Relic. Jacob also sent out today a list with the specs of the synth.
It has 8 fully independent voice cores with a discrete analog signal path that are tightly coupled to a digital mod system. Each voice consists of:
- 2 SEM-topology VCOs
- “super variable” state-variable VCF with a normal mode gradient sweep (LP4 – LP3 – LP2 – XF2 – BP4) and a classic mode gradient sweep (LP4 – LP3 – LP2 – NF2 – HP2). Plus, it has an extra dipole with additional gain cells for VC profile.
- VCA – 7 discrete VCAs with classic transconductance amplifiers and auto-calibration for subthreshold gain control.
- ENVs– 4 dAHDSR envelopes with a mathematically perfect delta function summation algorithm.
- LFOs – 4 LFOs with 3-dimensional warp capability
Moreover, it’s now 4x multitimbral with a 4-zone voice allocator and multilayer patch memory (512 programs with 4 patches each). So no longer bi-trimbral. The Relic has a very unique and unusual user interface.
Jacob describes it as a “revolutionary front panel interface with eight hyperfine encoders, a high-resolution light fader mainbar, and eight light fader minibars.
Shear Electronics also has launched a new website with further information about availability
As of February 2024, we are limited by supply. If you’re interested, make sure to put your name down on the waiting list by emailing relic@shearelectronics.com. We expect the Relic to be in high demand for a long time, so you should make sure to write your name down as soon as possible!
It looks like the development of the Relic is entering its final stages. Great to see. When it will officially be available and what it will cost is not yet known. Last time in the Sonicstate video, Jacob estimated a price of $ 6,500. Not sure if this price is still current.
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Article From October 31, 2022
In 2017, I attended the NAMM Show in Anaheim. It was my first time and had a lot of fun. Or as they say in Bavaria: a good Gaudi. Hidden between pedal, amp, and Chinese cable manufacturers, the then 18-year-old engineer Jacob Brashears exhibited the Relic. An authentic discrete analog clone of the Oberheim OB-X. A time when neither Oberheim nor Behringer was working on projects.
I wasn’t just fascinated by his project but also by his enthusiasm and understanding of analog circuits. After NAMM 17, the project went quiet for a long time. At SynthPlex 22 there was now a sign of life. Jacob had a small booth where he showcased the current prototypes.
Shear Electronics Relic Synthplex 22
Yes, the Relic project is alive, fantastic news and it’s even bigger than the unit from 2017. As a reminder: Relic is a discreetly built analog clone of the legendary Oberheim OB-X. According to Jakob, it will be a super authentic clone in terms of concept and sound. The features follows the year 2022 and the synth has a lot more built-in than its original unit.
The new relic now has 8-voices, is bi-timbral, and has four LFOs and 4 envelopes. Then, it offers two different filter topologies, one that gives you the classic state-variable filtering characteristics with SEM morphing capabilities and a normal mode. There are still some details missing because the filter structure in the Relic is very deep.
The look of the first Relic was very reminiscent of the Star Trek bridge. The current version doesn’t look much less futuristic, having doubled in size.
The Relic completely dispenses with a screen but uses a unique concept with a light-bar, buttons, and touch-responsive rotary knobs. For example, each modulation layer (env1, env2…) has a different color. Or you can find out what value the parameter currently has with a light touch on the knob without moving the whole knob
Unfortunately, there was no sound demo for the new Relic. That’s because the current engine is in calibration process. Jakob pointed to the NAMM 2017 demos which are close to what you get in the new one.
Even if the synth is completely out of my budget, I’m very happy to see that the project with Jakob continues.
The official price and the release date are TBA. But Jacob says they have enough components to do a limited run of 8 machines with estimated shipping by March 2023. If you are interested to buy one, you need to get yourself on the waiting list. He suggests it will cost at least $6500 USD.
More information here: Shear Electronics
Considering that run is limited to 8, with an inflated cost of $6,500 (clearly economies of scale at play here) from an unknown entity, and missed opportunities with such a large faceplate yet they chose a minuscule screen to share vital data, this is still a hard pass to an otherwise truly impressive feat.
I think the screen is bigger in real life.
I hope this synth is wildly successful and you clearly have a bright future in this segment if you wish to pursue it. However if I may, a $6,500 synth would have greatly benefited from an upgrade of that still relatively small screen. OLED modules are typically no more than $60 per unit for the larger variety, even in smaller quantities. And please, for the sake of science and further misinformation, do not give breath to this inane argument of analogue vs digital. Tonality can be replicated, duplicated, and creating in either technology.
Then why do you give breath to it by sharing your *opinion*?
With the most recent Behringer OB clone announcement, not to mention all the softsynth OB options available, just a couple days ago I was wondering if this was still being worked as a product. And here’s my answer, eh?
800 $ per voice on a synth module… That is a very steep hurdle to take. The user interface might be original but it doesn’t attract me. With this amount of real estate I myself would be looking at knobby synth modules.
If I was invited to spend such amount on a synth, this one would not make it on the wish list, independent of its sound.
It will probably remain a niche product. I hope he sells a couple of dozens of it to the wealthy amongst us, so he has some return on investment.
What a serious waste of time and money!
i’ll never buy anything with an LED color UI.
PHS: Your comment adds nothing other than a display of petty, negative energy.
The sheer tenacity this young man has demonstrated in building this synth is something you will never understand or appreciate. The efforts on his part have added to the dialog and exploration of new kit and independent synth creators. Bravo, Jakob!
This looks like a massive synth. It looks very capable and aesthetically pleasing. But for the sake of the project I hope they can scale up enough to lower that price. $6500 is just not competitive. I’m sure they understand that.
Congratulations Shear Electronics and Jacob Brashear, this looks and sounds fantastic.
Karen: Trying to shame someone for their opinion is a bit of hypocrisy.
PHS has a right to their opinion and I am sure there are people that agree. We do not have to support the feelings of everyone out there as you have shown with your comment to PHS. This effort could bankrupt the developers if it doesn’t sell, gaslighting can be harmful too.
Personally I think Jacob did a great job and shows a massive amount of knowledge gained from this but with what is available on the market, the size, the dated interface, and the price, sadly I don’t believe this will sell and is a waste of money for shear electronics. Look what happened with Modal and they had more cash backing them on 02/08, along with it being more modern with more functionality.
Reality can kick you sometimes…it’s sad.
If you don’t support early innovators, then you will find a world full of stale idea’s and nobody willing to take the risk to refresh them.
so you’re going to get one?
€14000?
14 thousand?
Is that correct Tom?
If people were complaining about it being €6500 imagine those same people now!
It has to be a mistake, surely?
€14000 is insane.
14K you say? Tough choice between this or the free VST I say.
14k for an OBX clone is ludicrous when at the same time we have the new Oberheim company releasing now 3 products with Focusrite/DSI: OB6, TEO-5 and OBX8.
I see the appeal in the interface but this is too expensive for a module.
2 years ago it was 10k. Before that it was 6,5k. And now 14K.
Congratulations on building a synth that nobody will buy Jacob.
Well, I for one cannot wait to give $6.5k, $10k AND $14k to a completely unknown company making a synth that brings nothing special to the table particularly in light of comparable synths already out there, and with an unsecured website that looks like it was designed by a 4th grader — in 1993.
Everything looks perfectly fine.
I had the “pleasure” of speaking to Jakob on 2 occasions during 2 different trade shows. Showman and a bit of con come to mind. And yes, the product is real and I am sure he has good intentions, yet the arrogance and attitude from this bloke turned me off to the synth immediately. If you think the price tag is a bit much, try discussing synthesis with this lad.
First off it’s a Oberheim B voice, not an Ob-8.Or an Ob-x.
Secondly the 8 voice cost $10185 in 1979.
Thirdly that’s$45,038.50 in 2025 dollars
Finally development cost money kids.
it’s based on the OB-X
Ouch, Tom is not playing around! The man knows his synths!
From the Shear Electronics website:
“The Relic-6 prototype was the first polyphonic synthesizer to implement a really authentic SEM-topology oscillator using surface-mount components.”
“Surface-mount technology (SMT) is a big deal, because it means that a classic design (like the SEM oscillator) can be seamlessly integrated into a modern production line and assembled by robots. We spent several months of intense research to develop authentic SEM-topology oscillators for the original Relic-6 prototype. And our latest SEM-topology oscillator took several additional months of development, just to make sure the final result is 100% authentic. Fortunately, our latest oscillator is also extremely reliable, so you will never need to worry about “VCO unstarts” and thermal overloads.”
” Forget about “state variable.” This filter changes everything.
Our Supervariable filter is an authentic state-variable filter, plus an extra dipole with additional gain cells for gradient-sweep voltage-controlled profile.”
Yes, the Ob-x had SEM based vcos. No, the Ob-x never had multimode filters. The SEM based 8 voice did.A lot of the stuff on his website is bunk, like how hard it is to do SMT SEM vcos, or how brutal analog vcos are. Maybe he doesn’t understand thermistors?
The fact that people take the time to make instruments like this and other boutique synths is commendable.
What I cannot fathom is the intended market? Is there a secret society of people like Ty Unwin? I can understand composers and producers purchasing due to incomes but how big is this market?
No thanks i’ll wait for the Behringer version.
it’s great what this guy has achieved but it is detached from reality. When he started the project it may have had some merit but now there are so many alternatives to the thing he has worked on. It is as if he couldn’t let the project go. From videos you get the impression that he is very stubborn. Now it is going to cost 14000 and kind of proves that his project is a failure in a sense. Yes he made the thing but no it is not possible to have this as a business. This is more of a hobby project that he is now trying to sell as a boutique item.
I’m sure some well known artists & performers will pick this up at that price point. As for me, I’m over clones and I wish the industry would be too.
The inside board design looks way better than the panel. But, does this synth really need three Power transformers and twelve heatsinks? Seems extremely “over-engineered” and the price is staggering.
I have also followed this project since its first demo. I was actually on the og waiting list and had the money tucked away for it.
To me, the only two devs that have ever been close to the original OB sound in poly form are Abstrakt and this dude, though SE nailed the filter on the Omega/Code. This sounds more legit than the OBX8. From a consumer pov, this could have been two different releases – the 1-for-1 recreation and the modulation beast it has become. But I get it, life gets in the way, and perfecting something takes time.
The problem is that when you do a show, you put the spotlight on yourself, and I don’t think this has helped. What helps is getting demo units to the Nick Batt’s and Matt Johnson’s of the world. If the consumer can’t see that the product holds its own after shipping than no one will pay car money for it. If people dont know whether after-sale support exists, they won’t buy. The company needs infrastructure.
If he gets one release under his belt, that might be the catalyst for more. I hope so, because he is talented. But he needs to get demos out, get a few good people for marketing/web, and properly establish himself. I’ve waited nearly ten years, I reckon I can wait a little longer.
At that price I could get C25, 3rd Wave Module, DMNO and Prophet 5. I wish him luck but I have a hard time seeing a market for this unless all you want is the sound of the OB-X.
he needs to send one to hans zimmer. he’ll sell a few after that.
About 10 years too late.
The world has moved on from *yet another* boring subtractive clone.